Waste treatment system

ABSTRACT

A system for removing water from sludge is disclosed. The system ( 100 ) includes: de-watering ( 102 ) sludge comprising an output from a wastewater treatment system to form a semi-solid sludge cake; dispensing ( 104 ) the sludge in a sludge hopper and dispensing a blending material in a recipient blending material hopper; depositing ( 106 ) the sludge and the blending material in a mixing device; mixing ( 108 ) the sludge and the blending material having a porous structure in a weight ratio of the sludge to the blending material of about from 2:1 to about 10:1; and compressing ( 110 ) the sludge and the blending material to release moisture. The system ( 100 ) provides an improved method of de-watering sludge, for more efficient processing, transporting and recycling, depending on the application.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an improved system for treating waste,and in particular a sludge or a bio-solid material from a wastewatertreatment plant, for example, human, animal, chemical, pharmaceutical,semiconductor, food, aluminium, ferric processing and the like, waste.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In practically all municipal wastewater treatment plants, waste water isseparated into treated water and waste material. The waste material isin the form of a sludge comprising both solid and liquid material, themajority of the material being liquid. Before transporting the wastematerial from one location to another for further processing, it isadvantageous to remove as much moisture or liquid from the sludge aspossible, as this reduces the weight of the sludge. Also, the lower thepercentage of moisture or liquid in the sludge, the lesser the chance ofgroundwater contamination due to seepage from the sludge.

It is known to initially de-water the sludge into a semi-solid sludgecake through drying and/or settling techniques. However, this sludgecake retains a substantial portion of moisture, requiring furthertreatment.

It is also known to employ compression apparatus, for example beltpresses, filter presses, screw presses, centrifuges, in an effort tosqueeze moisture out of the sludge cake. However, because of theconsistency of the sludge cake, or due to the presence of certainpolymers or flocculants within the sludge itself, it can be quitedifficult to effectively eliminate moisture content beyond a certainlevel from the sludge. In general, conventional techniques are onlycapable of eliminating that level of moisture to achieve a moisturecontent of 75-80% in such waste material. Under further compression, thesludge tends to bind and ooze in any direction possible, effectivelybehaving like a hydraulic fluid.

A system for solving this problem would be considered an improvement inthe art.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

An embodiment of the invention will now be described, by way of example,with reference to the following drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing of a waste treatment system, in accordancewith the instant invention;

FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of a sample compression apparatus ofFIG. 1; and

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of an embodiment of the system, in accordancewith the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

According to an embodiment of the present invention there is provided amethod of removing water from sludge. The method comprises adding to thesludge a blending material having a porous structure in a weight ratioof relatively wet sludge to relatively dry blending material of aboutfrom 2:1 to about 10:1.

As used herein, the term “sludge” has its common ordinary meaning, andis intended to mean the solid, semi-solid, or liquid waste orprecipitate generated in the treatment of wastewater (e.g. sewage orslurry).

In a preferred embodiment, the blending material is a compressiblematerial.

Advantageously, the introduction of a suitable blending material intothe sludge prior to compression can result in a greater portion ofmoisture being removed from the sludge, in some cases approaching or inexcess of about 60-70% moisture removal, which is considered asubstantial improvement in the field.

Suitable blending materials can vary and in one embodiment can includecellulose-based materials, for example wood shavings, newsprint andmilled peat. In addition, trommel fines, for example, the particlescollected via trommel screens during the recycling of household waste,can also be employed as a blending material. Open-cell sponges can alsobe used.

In one embodiment, the blending material comprises fine wood dust, andin a preferred embodiment, it is treated with a urea formaldehyde resin.

It has been found that dust collected during the machining of MediumDensity Fibreboard (MDF) is also effective as a blending material, forexample, what is referred to as sander dust.

In one embodiment, the ratio of sludge to blending material is fromabout 2:1 to about 10:1, and preferably from about 8:1 to about 10:1,dependent on such factors, as the type of waist and the moisture contentof the waist, for example.

Referring to FIG. 1, a waste treatment system according to a preferredembodiment is shown. Sludge, as output from a wastewater treatment plantor other suitable producer of wastewater material, is initiallyde-watered into a semi-solid sludge cake. The sludge cake is collectedin a sludge hopper 10. A suitable blending material to be mixed with thesludge cake is collected in a hopper 12.

Preferably, the blending material is a compressible material. Suitableblending materials include cellulose-based materials, for example woodshavings, newsprint and milled peat. Dust collected during the machiningof Medium Density Fibreboard (MDF) is also effective as a blendingmaterial, also referred to as sander dust. In addition, trommel fines orparticles collected via trommel screens during the recycling ofhousehold waste, can also be employed as blending material. Open-cellsponges may also be used.

In a preferred embodiment, fine wood dust treated with a ureaformaldehyde resin can provide good results when used as a blendingmaterial. A urea formaldehyde resin is found in MDF wood dust, and it isbelieved that the presence of this resin contributes to theeffectiveness of the compression.

In more detail, tests performed by the applicant suggest that thepresence of the resin solidifies the MDF dust particles, substantiallyminimizes the possibility of and/or substantially prevents the particlesfrom collapsing under the pressure exerted during compression. Theapplicant believes that the rigidity of the resin solidifies the MDFdust particles, to effectively provide an escape route for the water ormoisture, out of the material, while minimizing the composite materialfrom acting like a consistent hydraulic fluid.

As shown in FIG. 1, the sludge cake and the blending material aredispensed from their respective hoppers 10,12 to separate conveyors 14.The sludge cake and the blending material are deposited into a suitablemixing apparatus 16. It will be understood by those skilled in the art,that the mixing apparatus 16 may be chosen from at least one of a paddlemixer, screw mixer, agri feed mixer and any mixing or blending device,as known in the art.

The mixing apparatus 16 blends the sludge cake and the blending materialtogether to create a composite mixture. The mixing apparatus is operableto mix the sludge cake and the blending material together, preferably ata slow rate, such that the mixture is folded together rather thanbeaten, for improved mixing for example.

In a preferred embodiment, the mixing process is performed by foldingsuccessive layers of sludge cake into contact with layers of theblending material. Further mixing is accomplished through the continuedfolding together of layers of the composite mixture, until theconcentration of the composite mixture is substantially evenly spread.

The ratio of blending material to sludge cake in the composite mixturemay be adjusted depending on the type of blending material used. Forexample, when using wood shavings, a sludge cake to blending materialweight ratio of about 10:1 has been found to be most effective, while inthe case of milled peat the preferred ratio is about 2.5:1.

In the case of MDF dust material, a preferred ratio of sludge cake todust ranges from about 5:1 to about 2.5:1, depending on the dry mattercontent of the sludge cake.

As shown in FIG. 1, the composite mixture exits the mixing apparatus 16onto a conveyor 18. The composite mixture is then delivered to acompression apparatus 20. The compression apparatus 20 may be chosenfrom any one of a belt press, a screw press, a plate press, a batchpress, a filter press, a hydraulic press, or any compression device asknown in the art. The compression apparatus 20 is configured to allowthe release of moisture from the contained mixture during compression.

For example, the compression apparatus 20 may comprise a plate presshaving a conveyor located within the compression apparatus to firstlyconvey the composite mixture into the compression apparatus, and tosecondly convey the composite mixture after compression out of thecompression apparatus for further processing. The conveyor can beconfigured to allow the release of moisture from the contained mixtureduring compression. For example, in the case of a standard beltconveyor, the belt can be perforated to allow the moisture to drainthrough the conveyor belt. One or more of the plates used in the platepress can also be perforated, to allow the escape of moisture duringcompression.

As shown in FIG. 2, a cross-section of a sample compression apparatus 20is depicted. In this case, an enclosed plate press 22 comprising acompression ram 23 and an interior chamber 25, is shown. The compressionapparatus 20 is provided with a series of apertures 24 to allow thedrainage of moisture from the device 20. In FIG. 2 of the plate press22, the apertures 24 are provided in the surface of the plate press 22that the compression ram 23 acts against.

Initially, the ram 23 is maintained in an ‘at rest’ position at thatside of the plate press 22 opposite to the apertures 24, for example,the top of the plate press 22. In order to prevent the composite mixtureitself from being squeezed through the apertures during compression, afilter material 26 is provided over the apertures 24 and over thesurface of the ram 23 acting on the composite mixture. The filtermaterial 26 can be made from any porous material that allows throughpassage of liquids and minimizes the flow of solids, for example, suchas cotton.

In operation, the composite mixture is supplied to the interior chamber25 of the plate press 22. During compression, the ram 23 is driven in adownwards direction, towards the apertures 24. As the composite materialis compressed, moisture is forced from the mixture, in the form ofwastewater. The expelled wastewater then passes through the filtermaterial 26, and exits the plate press 22 through the apertures 24.Referring back to FIG. 1, the wastewater is then collected in a suitabledrain 28.

It will be understood that the above configuration for the plate pressmay be adapted as required for the other types of compression apparatusas mentioned, i.e. that the compression apparatus are configured toallow the escape of wastewater during compression, while retaining thesolid material.

Preferably, the compression generally occurs at pressures between 1379kPa (200 psi) and 13789 kPa (2000 psi). A large amount of wastewater isexpelled from the mixture at lower pressures, but if compression ismaintained at these levels, the majority of wastewater is substantiallyeliminated from the mixture.

In a preferred embodiment, the pressure is applied gradually, and ismaintained for a period of time to ensure maximum de-watering of thecomposite mixture. For example, for a portion of composite mixturehaving a width of approximately 101.6 cm (40 inches) and a depth ofapproximately 101.6 cm (40 inches), the period of time for compressionto substantially ensure maximum dewatering should be at least 30seconds.

The wastewater expelled from the composite mixture can then be returnedto the wastewater treatment plant for further processing and refinement.

The presence of the blending material in the composite mixture allowsfor a greater proportion of moisture to be squeezed from the sludgecake. Expelling the moisture from the composite mixture produces asubstantially de-watered resultant material, with a dry solids contentof upwards of 35%.

The resultant material is removed from the compression device 20 andbrought by conveyor 30 to drying apparatus 32. The substantiallyde-watered resultant material is more easily dried due to the reducedlevels of moisture present. The drying apparatus 32 can be one of acyclonic dryer, a thermal dryer, an air dryer, a drum dryer, or anydrying device as known in the art, for example the Tempest Drying Systemmanufactured by GRRO Incorporated is one such device.

After drying, the resultant material is substantially solid. The solidmaterial exits the drying apparatus at 34 and can then be furtherprocessed (system or apparatus) 36, depending on the application. Forexample, the further processing 36 can be a pelletiser, to convert thesolid material into pellets for burning as fuel.

It will be understood that the resultant material can also be utilisedas a substitute for the blending material to be mixed with the sludgecake. It has been found that the resultant material produced by theprocess may be re-used as blending material for approximately threeiterations, before the de-watering effects start to decline.

In an alternate embodiment, the mixing and compression steps can beperformed on location at a waste treatment plant, with the drying (andpossibly pelletising) steps performed at a remote location. In thiscase, the drying apparatus 32 in FIG. 1 may be replaced by a truck orsuitable transport device that transfers the resultant material outputfrom the compression apparatus 20 to a centralised location where thedrying and pelletising stages are carried out.

Alternatively, the waste treatment apparatus itself may be provided aspart of a mobile waste collection system. In this case, the hoppers10,12, mixing apparatus 16, and compression apparatus 20 are provided aspart of a vehicle, for example on the rear of a truck, or on a trucktrailer. The drying apparatus 32 may optionally be provided as part ofthe vehicle or, as above, the drying and further processing stages ofthe method may be performed at a remote location. An advantage of thismobile system is that businesses, for example farmers, that may not beable to afford construction of the system or would not be in a positionto continually utilise the system, could be visited by the mobileapparatus, such as by a waste service provider, for the treatment oftheir waste.

Use of this process or system, can result in a reduced moisture-levelend product, with more manageable properties and a dry solids contentapproaching upwards of 50-70%. The end material is substantially reducedin weight as opposed to conventional moisture extraction techniques, andis more easily transportable.

As shown in FIG. 3, a system for removing water from sludge 100, isshown. In one form, the system 100 includes: de-watering 102 sludgecomprising an output from a wastewater treatment system to form asemi-solid sludge cake;

dispensing 104 the sludge in a sludge hopper and dispensing a blendingmaterial in a recipient blending material hopper; depositing 106 thesludge and the blending material in a mixing device; mixing 108 thesludge and the blending material having a porous structure in a weightratio of the sludge to the blending material of about from 2:1 to about10:1; and compressing 110 the sludge and the blending material torelease moisture.

Advantageously, the system 100 provides an improved method ofde-watering sludge, for more efficient processing, transporting andrecycling, depending on the application. Advantageously, the system 100can dewater sludgecake from a wastewater stream, for example, andfurther dewater the sludgecake, which can then be recycled, reused ordisposed of. This system can be environmentally friendly, by providingrecycling and/or producing less material needing disposal, for example.

In one embodiment, the system 100 can improve dewatering of sewagesludge, both in undigested or undigested applications, and in apreferred embodiment, in a digested application, for example, the sludgeis pre-processed in a container where anaerobic digestion and processingoccurs.

The system 100 has a wide variety of potential applications. Forexample, the system can be used in sludges in connection with theprocessing of: human, animal and the like waste; aluminium, ferrics andthe like; pharmaceutical products; chemical products; semiconductorproducts; drugs and foods, such as in meat and milk processing, and thelike.

As detailed herein, in a preferred embodiment the blending materialcomprises a cellulose-based material treated with a urea formaldehyderesin, such as dust collected from machining of Medium DensityFibreboard (MDF).

The blending material can vary widely. For example, in a preferredembodiment, it can include any processed wood board in the form of asubstantially fine dust from an MDF wood board, chipboard or particleboard, oriented strand board and the like, provided it comprises acompressible material, such as a resilient binding material, such asglue, resin such as urea formaldehyde, and the like. The compressiblematerial includes a crystaline spacer-like structure adapted tosubstantially maintain at least some or most of its structure duringcompression, to allow the water to be escape. Other dry wood dust can beused as well.

In one embodiment, the blending material comprises a compressiblematerial of about 25% or less by weight of the blending material forimproved dewatering during compression, and preferably about 10% toabout 20% by weight of the blending material, for improved dewateringduring compression.

As previously stated, the compressible material provides a crystallinespacer-like structure adapted to substantially maintain its structureduring compression, to allow the water to be escape. It is believedthat, during initial compression the spacer-like structure allows anescape path, defining a first stage, and after the first stage, thespacer-like structure can slightly deform to allow additional water toescape, defining a second stage. In more detail, the crystallinespacer-like structure in the first stage has a first diameter thatallows water to escape. In the second stage, the crystalline spacer-likestructure has a second diameter, which is less than the first diameter,to allow further water to escape.

In a preferred embodiment, the compressible material comprises a ureaformaldehyde resin, which can be obtained from a binder supplier. Thismaterial is commonly used to bind the MDF, OSB or particleboard togetherand is added in the manufacturing process.

Additional blending materials can be used, such as wheat, barley, oats,rice and straw. By pulverizing and impregnating or treating theseblending materials, good dewatering results can occur. In a preferredembodiment, these additional blending materials can be used if firstprocessed by a Hammermill or similar device, in order to produce apowder or coarse material, adapted for mixing with a sludgecake, forimproved dewatering.

In the event the feed stock blending material does not include acompressible material, a compressible material can be added to and mixedin the blending material. For example, in FIG. 1, a sludge hopper 10,material hopper 12 and an additional hopper for the compressiblematerial (not shown in FIG. 1), can be fed via lines 14 and mixed inmixing apparatus 16. This can substantially improve dewatering duringcompression, as compared to the absence of the compressible material. Asshould be understood by those skilled in the art, other ways can beimplemented, for mixing these three constituents.

In a preferred embodiment, the mixing step 108 includes foldingsuccessive layers of sludge cake with the blending material and forminga composite mixture, such that the sludge and blending material aresubstantially evenly spread, for improved de-moisturization.

In a preferred embodiment, the mixing step 108 can include substantiallyhomogenous mixing, to provide improved dewatering, provided the correctratios are maintained. Rapid or slow mixing can be used. In a preferredembodiment, the mix should be of a texture being substantially evenlymixed throughout. Over mixing can disadvantageously result in apasty-like material that is not adapted for dewatering in this process.Depending on the moisture content of the sludgecake, the amount ofblending material for use in connection with this system can vary. Forexample, in one embodiment, the amount of blending material can be about5% by weight to about 60% by weight, for providing the desiredconsistency of the mix.

Also in a preferred embodiment, relative to the mixing step 108, theweight ratio of the sludge cake to blending material is about 10:1 whenthe blending material comprises wood shavings, the weight ratio of thesludge cake to blending material is about 2.5:1 when the blendingmaterial comprises milled peat, and the weight ratio of the sludge caketo blending material is about 5:1 to about 2.5:1 when the blendingmaterial comprises a cellulose-based material treated with a ureaformaldehyde resin, for improved de-watering of sludge.

The compressing step can vary. In a preferred embodiment, mix is placedor poured in a compressive device and subjected to a certain pressurefor desired dewatering. The mixed can be placed on a porous belt, suchas a polyester, polyamide or cloth belt, with an air permeability ofabout 360 cubic feet/minute (CFM) at a pressure of 125 PA. In moredetail, the belt can be placed or positioned on a porous rigid platethat is raised. The plate can have 5 mm holes at 15 mm centers, spacedthroughout. The mixed can be subjected to pressure by means of a pushplate. The mixed can be compressed or squeezed, and the moisure andwater is expelled through the porous belt and holes. The amount ofpressure required to expel the water variess, and is discussed in moredetail in Example 2.

The system 100 can further include at least one of drying the compressedmix in the compressing step 110, and converting it to form a solidmaterial adapted for use as fuel, re-use as a blending material and thelike.

In one embodiment, the system 100 can include further processing, suchas:

(i) macerating and/or pulverizing the dewatered sludgecake in order tobreak up and separate the blending material or dust particles comprisingsmaller particles, from the larger dewatered sludgecake particles. Thiscan be done with various machines, such as a hammer mill, high speedmixer and the like; And, (ii) separating the blending material anddewatered sludgecake. Since the particles of the dewatered sludgecakeand blending material, such as wood dust are different sizes, separationcan be done in a vibratory screen process. For example, the dewateredsludgecake with blending material is fed into a vibratory screen sizer,whereby the blending material or dust can fall through the screen and beseparated from the dewatered sludgecake. The blending material can bereclaimed for reuse a few more times and the dewatered sludgecake can bedisposed, recycled, etc.

EXAMPLE ONE

The following table shows the weight reduction produced in a small benchscale experiment for a number of different mixtures. A chamber which wastwelve inches deep and had a six inch diameter was filled with 4, 6 and8 inches of sludge and the indicated mixture. The chamber had a seriesof holes on the floor spaced about one centimeter apart in a series ofdecreasing circular arrangements. The about 40 holes had about a fivemillimeter diameter. A filter was placed adjacent to the floor andcomprised a conventional porous belt. A like sized circular piston witha substantially flat and circular end was used to apply a downwardpressure toward the floor of the chamber for about 30 to 60 seconds. Theinitial pressure was about 200 psi and final pressure was about 1000psi. It was observed that most of the water escaped through the holesupon the initial downward pressure, and thereafter additional waterexited the chamber. In more detail, a large amount of wastewater wasexpelled from the mixture at lower pressures, but if compression ismaintained, additional wastewater is expelled as well from the mixture.

TABLE 1 Mixture Weights Total Before Total After Reduction Wood Shavings 50 g 550 g 190 g 360 g Biosolids 500 g (13% Dry Solids) Milled Peat 200g 700 g 325 g 375 g Biosolids 500 g (13% Dry Solids) Shredded Newsprint 20 g 200 g  80 g 120 g Biosolids 180 g (11% Dry Solids) g equals grams

EXAMPLE TWO

In a preferred embodiment, good results were achieved in the followingmanner. A sewage sludge sample of undigested sludge cake with a moisurelevel of 87% was mixed at a rate of 18% with a dry MDF wood dust. Themix was placed in the dewatering device at a depth of 5 inches (125 mm).The following results were obtained from three batches of the above mix.

Batch 1 was compressed at a pressure of 250 pounds per square inch(psi). The additive was separated from the compressed sludgecakeafterwards. The moisure content of the compressed sludgecake was 44.6%moisure. This was a decrease of about 42.4 points of moisure.

Batch 2 was compressed at a pressure of 500 psi. The additive wasseparated from the compressed sludgecake afterwards. The moisure contentof the compressed sludgecake was 36.03% moisure. This was a decrease ofabout 50.97 points of moisure.

Batch 3 was compressed at a pressure of 1000 psi. The additive wasseparated from the compressed sludgecake afterwards. The moisure contentof the compressed sludgecake was 31.09% moisure. This was a decrease ofabout 55.91 points of moisure.

TABLE 2 Reduction Mixture Weights Solids Moisure Improvement OriginalSludge   100 lbs   13%   87% Batch 1 23.46 lbs  55.4%  44.6%  42.4% ptsBatch 2 20.32 lbs 63.97% 36.03% 50.97% pts Batch 3 18.86 lbs 68.91%31.09% 55.91% pts Solids (13 lbs in Orig and Batches 1-3)

Advantageously, Batches 1-3 provide a dewatered sludgecake which isgreatly reduced in weight and odor, and further, is adapted for furtherprocessing or disposal, as previously detailed.

In more detail, the result is a greatly dewatered sludgecake withreduced weight and odor. Use of this process, can result in a reducedmoisture-level end product, with more manageable properties and can havea dry solids content approaching upwards of 50-70%. The process providesa substantial improvement in dewatering sludgecake and reducing weight,as opposed to known conventional moisture extraction techniques. Thiscan help in providing more effective and efficient transport of thedewatered sludgecake and blending material.

As should be understood by those skilled in the art, the invention isnot limited to the embodiments described herein, and may be modified orvaried without departing from the scope of the invention.

1. A method for removing water from sludge, comprising the steps of: de-watering the sludge comprising an output from a wastewater treatment system to form a semi- solid sludge cake; dispensing the semi-solid sludge cake in a hopper and dispensing a blending material in a recipient blending material hopper; depositing the semi-solid sludge cake and the blending material in a mixing device; mixing the semi-solid sludge cake and the blending material having a porous structure in a weight ratio of the semi-solid sludge cake to the blending material of about from 2:1 to about 10:1; and compressing the semisolid sludge cake and the blending material to release moisture, wherein the blending material comprises: a processed wood board in the form of a dust; and a substantially compressible material comprising as least one of a glue, resin and urea formaldehyde.
 2. (canceled)
 3. The method system of claim 1, wherein the substantially compressible material comprises a substantially resilient spacer-like structure adapted to substantially maintain its structure during compression.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the blending material comprises a substantially compressible and resilient material, defining a spacer structure adapted to substantially maintain its structure during compression, to allow water to be escape.
 5. (canceled)
 6. (canceled)
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the blending material comprises at least one of a processed wood board in the form of a dust from at least one of a Medium Density Fibreboard wood board, chipboard, particle board and oriented strand board.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the blending material comprises: at least one of a processed wood board in the form of a dust from at least one of a Medium Density Fibreboard wood board, chipboard, particle board and oriented strand board; and a substantially compressible material.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the blending material comprises: at least one of a processed wood board in the form of a dust from at least one of a Medium Density Fibreboard wood board, chipboard, particle board and oriented strand board; and a resilient material including as least one of a glue, resin and urea formaldehyde.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the blending material comprises a cellulose-based material treated with a glue or resin, collected from machining of at least one of Medium Density Fibreboard wood board, chipboard, particle board and oriented strand board.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the blending material comprises a cellulose-based material treated with a urea formaldehyde resin, collected from machining of at least one of Medium Density Fibreboard wood board, chipboard, particle board and oriented strand board.
 12. (canceled)
 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the method includes dewatering a sludge in connection with the processing of at least one of: human waste, animal waste, aluminium, ferrics, pharmaceutical products, chemical products, semiconductor products, drugs and foods.
 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the blending material comprises a compressible material of about 25% or less by weight of the blending material.
 15. A method for removing water from sludge, comprising: de-watering sludge comprising an output from a wastewater treatment system to form a semi-solid sludge cake; dispensing the semi-solid sludge cake in a sludge hopper and dispensing a blending material in a recipient blending material hopper; depositing the semi-solid sludge cake and the blending material in a mixing device; mixing the semi-solid sludge cake and the blending material having a porous structure in a weight ratio of the semi-solid sludge cake to the blending material of about from 2:1 to about 10:1; and compressing the semi-solid sludge cake and the blending material to release moisture, wherein the blending material comprises: a processed wood board in the form of a dust and a binder material including at least one of a glue and resin, adapted to substantially maintain its structure during compression.
 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the blending material comprises a cellulose-based material treated with a glue or resin, collected from machining of at least one of Medium Density Fibreboard wood board, chipboard, particle board and oriented strand board.
 17. (canceled)
 18. An improved waste treatment method for removing water from sludge comprising: de-watering the sludge comprising an output from a wastewater treatment system to form a semi-solid sludge cake; dispensing the semi-solid sludge cake in a hopper and dispensing a blending material in a recipient blending material hopper; depositing the semi-solid sludge cake and the blending material in a mixing device; mixing the semi-solid sludge cake and the blending material having a porous structure in a weight ratio of the semi-solid sludge cake to the blending material of about from 2:1 to about 10:1; and compressing the semi-solid sludge cake and the blending material to release moisture, wherein the blending material comprises: a processed wood board in the form of a dust and a binder including a urea formaldehyde resin, adapted to substantially maintain its structure during the compressing step.
 19. The method system of claim 18, wherein the blending material comprises a substantially compressible material configured to provide a crystalline spacer structure adapted to substantially maintain its structure during compression, to allow the water to be escape, whereby: during initial compression the spacer structure allows an escape path, defining a first stage; and after the first stage, the spacer structure can slightly deform to allow additional water to escape, defining a second stage.
 20. (canceled) 